Like Tree19Likes

The end of focus?

Reply
Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    781

    The end of focus?

    A Camera That Couldnt Care Less About Focus: Introducing Lytro

    The camera is different from those on the market in that it doesn't need to focus, you can adjust the focus after taking the picture.

    Frankly, I'm not impressed. I don't think any photographer worth his salt would not want to focus, but I guess this is targetted at mainly the point-and-shoot market.
    luckycat, TigerSun and seahawk like this.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    3,378

    Interesting. I would love to know the mechanics behind this. Presumably the lens is like a barrel.

    This will obviously not be for the purist photographers but for the point and shoot photographers. I do think they have missed a trick though. Most P+S photographers don't do post-processing and on this basis, I am unsure of how popular this will be to its target market.

    If you have an image which contains enough data to focus on any part of the image, that will involve combining a large number of "normal" photos. If the file size is comparable to normal photos currently being produced, then quality is going to seriously suffer.

    Last edited by luckycat; 23-06-2011 at 09:08 AM.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    781

    That's what I thought. It seems a great idea in theory, but the bulk of the P+S market is teenagers taking "kawaii" pictures or vacationers. I doubt they'll have the inclination to do a whole lot of post-processing in order to get something a P+S provides immediately.


  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    in my home
    Posts
    3,463

    yeah...Adobe has been in the works for some time on their own version of this too, using a special add-on lens and some fancy software. i can not wait. it will really revolutionize the camera experience, for better or worse.


  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    in my home
    Posts
    3,463

    excusing the quality comment, as there is not enough details (pun intended) on that and in my head im thinking similar to gigapixel type photos.

    but assuming quality is not an issue, why wouldn't "any photographer worth his salt" care about this? No matter how skilled of a photographer you are, sometimes you miss that perfect focus due to various reasons. Or perhaps during your edits you realize it would have been so much better if focus was adjusted slightly.

    a good photograph still requires a skilled photographer with an eye for composition, but this just helps make the capturing job one step easier to achieve what that photographer is seeing in his mind.

    Last edited by BenderBends; 23-06-2011 at 09:22 AM.

  6. #6
    bdw
    bdw is online now

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    5,462
    Quote Originally Posted by vinyljunky
    Frankly, I'm not impressed. I don't think any photographer worth his salt would not want to focus
    10 or so years ago, people were saying:

    Frankly, I'm not impressed. I don't think any photographer worth his salt would use a digital camera
    Then all of a sudden Kodak and Fuji died almost overnight.

    Times change.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    18,635

    Well it depends if you can alter depth of field on this system surely. On that test image you can simply alter the focal point or zoom. Some shots work much better with a certain depth of field.


  8. #8

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    781
    Quote Originally Posted by BenderBends
    a good photograph still requires a skilled photographer with an eye for composition, but this just helps make the capturing job one step easier to achieve what that photographer is seeing in his mind.
    I agree that composition is one of the most important aspects of a photo. However (personally speaking), I like full control over every aspect of my camera - it's imperative towards me achieving a good picture. Focusing is both an art and science, I would never hand it over to a piece of software.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    781
    Quote Originally Posted by bdw
    Then all of a sudden Kodak and Fuji died almost overnight.

    Times change.
    Well, not so long ago Betamax was the next best thing. Let's not forget 8 track tapes. Or MiniDiscs. Even more recently, HD DVD. And the jury's still out on 3D TV.

    For every one technological "breakthrough" that makes it, there are others that don't.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    2,257
    Quote Originally Posted by vinyljunky
    That's what I thought. It seems a great idea in theory, but the bulk of the P+S market is teenagers taking "kawaii" pictures or vacationers. I doubt they'll have the inclination to do a whole lot of post-processing in order to get something a P+S provides immediately.
    Presumably there's no reason once you establish the system that you couldn't have automatic, in-camera post processing for focus just as you do for sharpening, colour saturation etc. I.e. the in-camera software would select a suggested focus just like auto-focus on the lens does now so you don't have to post process, but you would have the option to adjust focus afterwards if you wanted to.

    For 'photographers' there's also presumably no reason why they couldn't allow the photographer to 'focus' in camera whilst shooting through software either using focusing points or manually, again just like they would with a lens but software controlled. This would set a focus point in the file but you could adjust it afterward in post if necessary.

    So basically you could have 'point and shoot' and 'pro' cameras working in much the same way as they do now but with the software doing the focusing work instead of the lens and the option to adjust focus afterwards in post. Depends on trade-offs with other quality considerations, speed of 'virtual focus', workflow and how the costs work whether it's worth it for this I guess.

    Of course there are implications for metering and exposure if there's no focus point but presumably they can put software based metering in too.
    Last edited by dipper; 23-06-2011 at 09:47 AM.

Reply
Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast