Like Tree10Likes

First time getting into DSLR

Reply
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
  1. #21

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    a sunny un spoilt paradise
    Posts
    7,175
    Quote Originally Posted by GeoTommy
    I believe we downsize images by 75% in quality for faster loading. Best to upload the full 12 megapixel file to Flickr and link it here if you really want to show off the quality and sharpness.

    No issues on our end. In the Manage Attachments window, you just keep uploading however many files (10 max) with the "Upload Files from your Computer" input/browse button.
    Thanks for the explanation Tommy...Cheers, bloke.

    Setting up a Flickr account as we speak.... lol

  2. #22

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Sai Kung
    Posts
    1,329
    Quote Originally Posted by mrdream
    I don't have a particular purpose with this DSLR. Basically for everyday use and I'd like to be able to use it to produce some images that I could use for a website I'm creating (mainly close up and indoor shots).
    You do not NEED a DSLR to produce great images. If you have no active interest / passion in learning photography, then I would argue that you have no need for DSLR. People have a misconception that if they purchase an expensive kit, they will get AMAZING photos. That is simply not true. A skilled photographer who knows how to masterfully use light and environment can create amazing images with nearly any equipment.

    While there are many benefits of DSLRs for us hobbyists / professionals, to an everyday user they are often a burnen which ends up collecting dust and then re-sold after the value depreciation.

    Fo every-day photos I doubt very much one needs more than a compact (i.e. Canon Powershot S100 which is a very capable little camera which even pro's use for travel / scouting).

    If you don't want the weight but want the flexibility of depth of field / focal lengths than as others mentioned, mirrorless systems may be an option as well (Olympus PEN, Panasonic GF2, Nikon 1, etc)

    However, if you are serious about learning photography and using it for a wide array of applications then a more serious kit may be in order. However, I would first look at the budget and purpose and then make a recommendation based on that. Often times, money is better spent on quality accessories (such as Tripod / head, glass, filters, lights) than on a camera body. DSLR bodies change all the time, but a solid investment in glass / tripod will last for a long long time. It all depends on the need.

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    HK
    Posts
    1,807

    I would agree with 80% of what climber is saying. However, the Op mentioned that he will be taking alot of indoor pics which means that low light ability is an important consideration. A DSLR will generally be less noisy and allow the user to select a higher ISO so as to avoid using flash while handholding.

    My personal bias - let me first say I really like the Canon S100, however, for many instances where a P&S form factor is appreciated I think something like an Apple iPhone will do. Therefore, I don't see the need for a p&s if one has a nice smart cameraphone.

    Depth of field - control over this is very important even to beginner photographers, and the OP wanted to grow into his camera. Hence, if he doesn't mind the bigger bulk, then a DSLR is the way to go. As I said, the Canon 5DMkII will be dropping in price and this is a great camera (full frame is in my opinion the way forward - I am old school film guy and the crop sensors just don't do it for me). The camera is not important used to be the mantra in the film days, but with today's digi cams, the camera is becoming increasingly more important.

    But then the OP never stated his budget, so whilst a 5DII is value to me, it may be too much camera for him price wise.


  4. #24

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    19,908
    Quote Originally Posted by threelittlepigs
    I would agree with 80% of what climber is saying. However, the Op mentioned that he will be taking alot of indoor pics which means that low light ability is an important consideration. A DSLR will generally be less noisy and allow the user to select a higher ISO so as to avoid using flash while handholding.
    You are exactly right in this - I have three cameras - a small Canon SD-something (P&S), a Canon G9 (slightly chunkier - used underwater) and a Canon 600D. Outdoors, with plenty of light the differences between cameras in a standard portrait or landscape shot at not really noticeable for most purposes.

    However, indoors the difference is huge - the dSLR with optical image stabilization, fast lens and better noise control at higher ISO creates stunning shots whereas the smaller ones are unusable without flash. Fast lens and dSLR is definitely the way to go if you want to shoot indoors without flash.

  5. #25

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    60

    Thanks guys. Just wanted to give you all an update that I got a Canon 600D. I appreciate all your help!


  6. #26

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Sai Kung
    Posts
    1,329
    Quote Originally Posted by TheBrit
    However, indoors the difference is huge - the dSLR with optical image stabilization, fast lens and better noise control at higher ISO creates stunning shots whereas the smaller ones are unusable without flash. Fast lens and dSLR is definitely the way to go if you want to shoot indoors without flash.
    Did not see OP stated he wanted to shoot indoors / no flash.

    Quote Originally Posted by mrdream
    Thanks guys. Just wanted to give you all an update that I got a Canon 600D. I appreciate all your help!
    Good Luck! Did you buy just the body or the kit with the 18-55?

    If you haven't done so already, I would highly recommend that you purchase a 50mm f1.8 lens (dirt cheap and fast)....although a bit long for a cropped sensor. Not sure if Canon has a resonably priced "normal" focal lens alternative (i.e. 28mm f1.8m, etc)...if not you may want to consider a third party...such as Sigma 30mm f1.4.

  7. #27

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    950
    Quote Originally Posted by mrdream
    Thanks guys. Just wanted to give you all an update that I got a Canon 600D. I appreciate all your help!
    Welcome to the slippery slopes of DSLR ownership and photo enthusiasm
    climber07 likes this.

  8. #28

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    19,908
    Quote Originally Posted by climber07
    Did not see OP stated he wanted to shoot indoors / no flash.
    He didn't, but I do and the results are great - was just adding some more detail to help flesh out some details.

    Quote Originally Posted by climber07
    Not sure if Canon has a resonably priced "normal" focal lens alternative (i.e. 28mm f1.8m, etc)...if not you may want to consider a third party...such as Sigma 30mm f1.4.
    I have the 28mm f/1.8 Canon prime lens and it's a great piece of glass. 35mm equivalent effective focal length is just shy of 50mm on APS-C sensor. Was not that cheap but I am delighted with the quality - autofocus is fast, semi-silent and rarely misses.

  9. #29

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,683
    Quote Originally Posted by mrdream
    Thanks guys. Just wanted to give you all an update that I got a Canon 600D. I appreciate all your help!
    Great, you can now loan it to karolanna.

    But seriously, congrats on the purchase. And do post some pics taken with it!

  10. #30

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    60

    Thanks everyone I got 600D with the 18-135mm lens. Btw... everyone says OP here. I figured it was me you guys were talking about... but what does OP actually mean?

    After I get the time to read the manual fully, I'd like to participate in some photography groups on here. If you guys are in any of those, I'd like to join some time


Reply
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast