Like Tree11Likes

SCB & Others Refusing Personal Accounts

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    249

    SCB & Others Refusing Personal Accounts

    Edit Note: Split out from another thread about Stan Chart...


    SC is a piece of something, they've closed my personal account after 6 years for having wrong passport (and I don't know anybody with wrong passport that could open or keep/maintain account there). Hope there's a special place in hell for their decision makers.
    Moreover Mox few months later (we're talking about mid 2022) implemented the same discriminatory policy, and doesn't even dare to admit that. What you could possibly do wrong with Mox account lol.

    For anybody reading this and thinking of HKMA - no they don't care and are completely happy with cliche answers from Mox, even if several people with wrong passports make joint complaint about batch account closures...
    Last edited by shri; 19-09-2023 at 04:18 PM.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    May 2021
    Posts
    1,725
    Quote Originally Posted by GotIt:
    SC is a piece of something, they've closed my personal account after 6 years for having wrong passport (and I don't know anybody with wrong passport that could open or keep/maintain account there). Hope there's a special place in hell for their decision makers.
    What do you mean by wrong passport?

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    249

    Passport of a small country which is European version of North Korea/Iran


  4. #4

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    15,747
    Quote Originally Posted by GotIt:
    Passport of a small country which is European version of North Korea/Iran
    Ah so sanctions issues.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    249
    Quote Originally Posted by pin:
    Ah so sanctions issues.
    Would've been easier if they admit it.
    But not even possible to say is it local SC or intenational SC that applies own interpretations of what sanctions should be in local banking, probably having excuse that they're "international bank".
    Grinnie Jax and Anahan like this.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    香港特别行政区
    Posts
    3,502
    Quote Originally Posted by GotIt:
    Would've been easier if they admit it.
    But not even possible to say is it local SC or intenational SC that applies own interpretations of what sanctions should be in local banking, probably having excuse that they're "international bank".
    It's illegal for a bank to tell you why they refuse your business, particularly if it's in respect to you being sanctioned or flagged for fraud / money laundering.
    rkenia852 likes this.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    249

    They refuse personal accounts


  8. #8

    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    香港特别行政区
    Posts
    3,502
    Quote Originally Posted by GotIt:
    They refuse personal accounts
    The regulations also apply to personal accounts

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    249
    Quote Originally Posted by aw451:
    The regulations also apply to personal accounts
    Hong Kong/China has made no relevant sanctions.
    It’s not like ALL the banks refuse, just some. In HK it’s BoC and SC from major ones.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    位置位置位置
    Posts
    50,731
    Quote Originally Posted by GotIt:
    Hong Kong/China has made no relevant sanctions.
    It’s not like ALL the banks refuse, just some. In HK it’s BoC and SC from major ones.
    You're not going to win against U.S. sanctions... if a bank does business in the US or with US banks, is interconnected with US facilities like SWIFT, then it has to fall in line.

    There might be banks which don't mind ... check which ones allow Carrie Lam and others who are under US sanctions to open / maintain accounts.
    rkenia852 and RobRoy like this.

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast