I wouldn't normally do this but I cannot believe the front of some people. Rangers Mike PM'd me asking me why I'd "attacked him online." I pointed out that I had actually apologised immediately and listed my apology and my other responses. He then sent me this:
"Re: Why did you attack me online
Sorry on getting the exact thing you said mixed up with someone else. I am however still utterly bemused why you attacked me for stating I didn't like the restaurant without being offensive. Even if you apologised after the instance that doesn't hide the fact you attacked me for no good reason. Its just incredibly odd behaviour- someone said 'I like x' someone else says 'I disagree' and then random people attack them.
TBH I don't know why I bothered messaging you- I was drunk and made the error of wondering why I had been getting all these alerts saying people replied. Anyone who attacks anyone online is a bit special and arguing with someone on the internet is a just sad- even if you 'win' you will still be a loser. As someone said to me this morning you find yourself being offended by someone who attacks you online but then you realise these people aren't exactly living the high life with 1,500 posts in a year.
I really don't get how people think its odd not going to many veggie restaurants. All my friends here bar a few eat meat, and I'd be a odd ball if I didn't eat at places with cater for both of us instead of forcing my views onto others.
BTW I wouldn't take the moral high ground on semantics btw."
I have no idea why I have been singled out for this when all I asked for was a recommendation which to Rangers Mike meant that I was attacking him.