Like Tree67Likes

Taking foreign spouse to UK

Reply
Page 9 of 11 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 LastLast
  1. #81

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Pampanga, Philippines
    Posts
    25,116
    Quote Originally Posted by HK_Katherine:
    I wonder if anyone has done a breakdown of the nationalities of all those spouses not being allowed into the country. If the result is that 90% of them come from the Indian subcontinent, I suspect one might be able to argue the policy is racist. On the other hand, if they come from "all over the place" - including as noted in the article relatively well off people in the USA - its hard to see what its trying to achieve.
    It is trying to appease the Daily Mail readers.

    The income threshold for immigrants is due to rise to 35,000 pounds in 2016. As has been pointed out, but so far ignored by the government, this means the UK can no longer recruit outside of Europe to fill its significant shortage of nurses.

  2. #82

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    7,478

    Moving, I'm not sure about the nationalities or races involved. The issue to me is, naive as I am, I assumed that a British child, with a British parent, should be allowed to live in Britain with his or her parents. The revalation that many such children must either be separated from their 'foreign' parent, or else be forbidden to live in the UK, is sad to me.

    Especially when you consider trying to explain such a thing. "Oh mummy can't live with us. The government won't let her in because she is not European."


  3. #83

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    ???
    Posts
    39,685

    But when you look at the restrictions and requirements, I also suspect that people who have the funds are just going to go "is it worth it".

    Silly things like proving that I can speak English ... f' it. Not worth it.

    Enderman likes this.

  4. #84

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    7,478
    Quote Originally Posted by shri:
    But when you look at the restrictions and requirements, I also suspect that people who have the funds are just going to go "is it worth it".

    Silly things like proving that I can speak English ... f' it. Not worth it.
    That's pretty much our stance. We can afford it but it is too much effort.

  5. #85

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    900

    I think in order to get total immigration numbers down they've stepped on the non-EU migrants part of the equation. They have no control at all over the number of EU migrants.

    So, if I've got that right, if you are French or German you can take your Hong Kong wife and go and live/work in the UK without any means test, also receive benefits after 3 months.

    A British citizen attempting the same will be means tested for salary and or savings and spouse refused if not up to the required level. Benefits eligibility is also delayed for some years in any case.


  6. #86

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    11,755
    Quote Originally Posted by justjoe86:
    Moving, I'm not sure about the nationalities or races involved. The issue to me is, naive as I am, I assumed that a British child, with a British parent, should be allowed to live in Britain with his or her parents. The revalation that many such children must either be separated from their 'foreign' parent, or else be forbidden to live in the UK, is sad to me.

    Especially when you consider trying to explain such a thing. "Oh mummy can't live with us. The government won't let her in because she is not European."
    I don't disagree with you.

    I tried to discuss then when I was back in the UK with my family earlier this year. My sister is also married to an Australian, who happened to be living in the UK when they met (well before this fiasco). I assumed, therefore, that she would also think that this situation is ridiculous. Far from it. As far as they were concerned, it was a "good" policy aimed at keeping out all those poor Bangladeshi wives who will go on welfare as soon as they arrive. When I tried to say something like "but if you'd met your husband in Australia and this was in effect, you might have been unable to bring him here" to which her (true, but unhelpful) reply was "no because he had the right to a apply for a UK passport because of his grandfather". She was completely unable to see that, but for a few (almost irrelevant) details, she could have been caught up in this. So if someone like that can't see how unfair this is, I can't see the Government changing their mind any time soon.

  7. #87

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Pampanga, Philippines
    Posts
    25,116
    Quote Originally Posted by HK_Katherine:
    I don't disagree with you.

    I tried to discuss then when I was back in the UK with my family earlier this year. My sister is also married to an Australian, who happened to be living in the UK when they met (well before this fiasco). I assumed, therefore, that she would also think that this situation is ridiculous. Far from it. As far as they were concerned, it was a "good" policy aimed at keeping out all those poor Bangladeshi wives who will go on welfare as soon as they arrive. When I tried to say something like "but if you'd met your husband in Australia and this was in effect, you might have been unable to bring him here" to which her (true, but unhelpful) reply was "no because he had the right to a apply for a UK passport because of his grandfather". She was completely unable to see that, but for a few (almost irrelevant) details, she could have been caught up in this. So if someone like that can't see how unfair this is, I can't see the Government changing their mind any time soon.
    Yes and this is confounded by a general ignorance on the subject. Most of my friends, all highly educated, assumed that as I was British my wife would automatically get British citizenship with no hassle.
    HK_Katherine likes this.

  8. #88

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    900

    Just to recap then, Syrian refugees fine, no problem. British citizen's wife or children, hang on a minute.

    Like the quote :The Home Office said: "We welcome those who wish to make a life in the UK with their family, work hard and make a contribution. But family life must not be established here at the taxpayer's expense.'

    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-34191606

    shri, jaykay, Enderman and 1 others like this.

  9. #89

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    22,474
    Quote Originally Posted by Ern:
    Just to recap then, Syrian refugees fine, no problem. British citizen's wife or children, hang on a minute.

    Like the quote :The Home Office said: "We welcome those who wish to make a life in the UK with their family, work hard and make a contribution. But family life must not be established here at the taxpayer's expense.'

    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-34191606
    You make a fair point.

  10. #90

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    11,755
    Quote Originally Posted by Ern:
    Just to recap then, Syrian refugees fine, no problem. British citizen's wife or children, hang on a minute.

    Like the quote :The Home Office said: "We welcome those who wish to make a life in the UK with their family, work hard and make a contribution. But family life must not be established here at the taxpayer's expense.'

    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-34191606
    The UK is doing far less than many other European countries on the matter of Syrian refugees. So they are consistent. And I'm not sure one group is any more deserving than another - both genuine refugees AND families of british citizens should be welcome!

Reply
Page 9 of 11 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 LastLast