
Originally Posted by civil_servant:
The dreaming starts with the article. Sounds like Sim City. Put harbour here, cleanup brownfield sites, change policy, move temporary tenancies, next turn. All easily done by 2030.
Here's my proposal. You can keep your harbour, we, in Tuen Mun, take the horse track in Happy Valley instead, and you can fill that part with loads of public housing. Tuen Mun already has a giant power plant, a huge garbage dump, takes the city's recycling, treats the cities sludge, and provides a ton of public housing. Screw this proposal of putting the harbour here especially given that Tuen Mun road is already jammed most days.
The article should read, theoretically Hong Kong has enough land for 2.8 million flats, but practically a lot of these proposals are not feasible within the coming decade.
What the government has done is commit to 460000 units under a practical scenario. There's a feasibility study underway to make use of brownfield sites, which aren't easy to deal with. These can take a long time to clean up and may not get fully decontaminated. Who will volunteer to live there? Hopefully, some good progress will come out of that.