...and resulting in different coverage between SCMP and HKFP:Tuesday’s panel discussion was open to foreign media...
https://www.scmp.com/print/news/chin...ional-training
https://www.hongkongfp.com/2019/03/1...-two-sessions/
The SCMP is a tough read today. So much China positivity and the rest of the world being wrong
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/mili...fence-minister
https://www.scmp.com/economy/global-...etnam-beijings
https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/...held-hong-kong
https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/south...hunning-trumps
https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-e...fter-us-tariff
https://www.scmp.com/tech/article/30...review-process
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/poli...anmen-protests
https://www.scmp.com/comment/opinion...get-if-it-acts
Last edited by East_coast; 03-06-2019 at 02:28 PM.
The pro China articles probably have something to do with the fact the journalists are probably more mainlandish Chinese than Hong Kong Chinese as judging from their names.
In an unrelated fact government owned RTHK are much better at being impartial. Having been following the RTHK reporters on Twitter, it’s evident that they try their best to report fairly even if they lean towards the pro democracy side.
Having been to Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia a few times in the past few month to look at the impact of the tariffs and anti-dumping duties. It would take a pretty 'ambitious' editor to make the story about how a mid sized but glorious a CCP owned industrial park is doing.
It is not a conspiracy theory just a comment on the editorial choices of a the paper. It would of been hard to imagine such an approach 5-6 years ago. Perhaps some may think this approach is quality journalism - finding the small story instead of reporting the bigger stories. To me it just looks like propaganda.
Last edited by East_coast; 03-06-2019 at 08:39 PM.
https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/...ening-industry
Another article on the scourge of face whitening
Xi's policies again force changes
https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/en/compone...5-20200219.htm