Like Tree16Likes

Preliminary study shows first hamster to human transmission of Covid-19 in HK

Reply
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
  1. #11

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    3,886
    Quote Originally Posted by orionx999:
    This. On a peer review, most likely other researchers will try to duplicate the research.
    That’s not the case.

    Some researchers may attempt to duplicate results on some papers, but the vast majority go unchallenged directly unless that piece of research is a relavent link in a process needed by themselves.

    There’s many many thousands of dead beat papers that are checked for methodology and then consigned to a pile of mostly useless knowledge.

  2. #12

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Pampanga, Philippines
    Posts
    29,154
    Quote Originally Posted by Sage:
    That’s not the case.

    Some researchers may attempt to duplicate results on some papers, but the vast majority go unchallenged directly unless that piece of research is a relavent link in a process needed by themselves.

    There’s many many thousands of dead beat papers that are checked for methodology and then consigned to a pile of mostly useless knowledge.
    Getting funding for duplicate research is going to be near impossible so as you say very unlikely to happen. Then if you did it and it confirmed the original who would publish it? Funding and publication are what counts for an academic career.
    Sage likes this.

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    24,255
    Quote Originally Posted by hullexile:
    However if other researchers start to get different results it would be questioned even after peer review.
    How are others going to test this?!

  4. #14

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Pampanga, Philippines
    Posts
    29,154
    Quote Originally Posted by TheBrit:
    How are others going to test this?!
    No idea .

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    929

    The future is bleak for Hong Kong hamsters, much like the rest of us.

    rs4, MABinPengChau and hullexile like this.

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Posts
    507

    My take is the whole premise of this fiasco is patient zero did not come into close contact with anyone with delta ergo it must have been the hamsters. Wasn’t delta circulating around Shenzhen at the same time?

    Baklava, natino, Sage and 2 others like this.

  7. #17

    Buyers remorse - he is freaking out - can smell the fear.


  8. #18

    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Taiwan and HK
    Posts
    5,964
    Quote Originally Posted by seirin:
    My take is the whole premise of this fiasco is patient zero did not come into close contact with anyone with delta ergo it must have been the hamsters. Wasn’t delta circulating around Shenzhen at the same time?
    This times 1000.

    Nothing in the paper proves it was hamster to human just "it wasn't here, must have been the hamsters."
    hullexile likes this.

  9. #19

    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Posts
    565
    Quote Originally Posted by seirin:
    My take is the whole premise of this fiasco is patient zero did not come into close contact with anyone with delta ergo it must have been the hamsters. Wasn’t delta circulating around Shenzhen at the same time?
    They've already compared the Delta sequences with those from China and there were no matches. You can check for yourself as all sequences are uploaded to GISAID and thus public.
    hullexile and orionx999 like this.

  10. #20

    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    210
    Quote Originally Posted by qhank:
    They've already compared the Delta sequences with those from China and there were no matches. You can check for yourself as all sequences are uploaded to GISAID and thus public.
    This one still believes we can trust the data out of China 😂

Reply
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast