32Likes
-
07-02-2022, 01:44 PM #31
-
-
07-02-2022, 01:49 PM #32
-
07-02-2022, 01:56 PM #33
they are self explanatory if you deign to read them your majesty -Meanwhile the Economist looked at overall death rates- many countries do not attribute deaths to Covid where the deceased had comorbidities
https://www.economist.com/graphic-de...aths-estimates
-
07-02-2022, 09:47 PM #34
formatting problem
The New York Times got it right this morning
""Government health officials, as well as some experts, struggle to communicate effectively with the hundreds of millions of us who are not experts.
They speak in the language of academia, without recognizing how it confuses people. Rather than clearly explaining the big picture, they emphasize small amounts of uncertainty that are important to scientific research but can be counterproductive during a global emergency. They are cautious to the point of hampering public health.
As an analogy, imagine if a group of engineers surrounded firefighters outside a burning building and started questioning whether they were using the most powerful hoses on the market. The questions might be reasonable in another setting — and pointless if not damaging during a blaze".
-
12-02-2022, 03:17 PM #35
-
12-02-2022, 03:22 PM #36
-
12-02-2022, 07:31 PM #37
Save some face - switch to Zero Deaths instead of the impossible current
www.thestandard.com.hk /section-news/section/17/238782/Deaths,-not-infections,-must-now-be-focus
-
12-02-2022, 07:56 PM #38
-
12-02-2022, 09:47 PM #39
-
05-12-2022, 07:28 PM #40
There is more FUD around sinovac coming off the mainland today, it could have been falsely certificated or something - I can't find any published new yet but still looking around
Quote
Originally Posted by dynamco:
