SCMP editorial today - re HKG government

Closed Thread
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    15,710

    SCMP editorial today - re HKG government

    Great editorial in the SCMP today:

    Latest Hong Kong, China & World News | SCMP.com

    A government too afraid to look after its people
    Stephen Vines
    Updated on Mar 13, 2009

    "One thing that citizens of practically any country can count on is the help and support of their government when they get into trouble overseas. Hong Kong residents, lamentably, do not enjoy such an assurance.

    They are, of course, not even citizens of the special administrative region but do belong to a self-governing entity that rarely demonstrates concern when they leave its borders. This is among the most troubling aspects of the difficulties that a growing number of Hong Kong residents have faced when trying to enter Macau.

    The government's initial response was to ignore this rebuff. Then, ever so cautiously, it produced a muttering of concern. The impression is of an administration so scared by its own shadow that it dare not stand up for the people it governs, lest offence be given to the sovereign power.

    This also explains why Hong Kong residents who encounter problems on the mainland itself can rarely expect the government to lift a finger, particularly when there is a political tinge to these problems.

    Meanwhile, on the mainland, it is far from unknown for provincial officials to make a stand against their counterparts from other provinces or indeed from the central government when their people run into trouble. They know the system well enough to understand the limits of this intervention but, within those boundaries, understand the need to protect their own people's interests.

    The Hong Kong government behaves like a quavering schoolchild in its dealings with the central government. It is depressing to see our officials, literally standing with bowed heads, waiting to be told what to do by their masters from the north. They lack the confidence to assert the rights of the SAR and because the Chinese system, like all authoritarian systems, tends to be opaque, they err on the side of caution for fear of doing anything to anger the authorities.

    This is why the cowed officials who run Hong Kong have been so reluctant to take a stand on the flagrantly obstructive attitude of the Macau government. They wonder, but cannot be sure, whether their Macanese counterparts are acting on orders from Beijing, or whether this is some locally conceived scheme for shutting the door on anyone who might be critical of their policies.

    In all events, the message to Hong Kong residents is clear: you are on your own if you leave the borders of the SAR, and help will only be provided if it becomes too embarrassing for the government to remain silent.

    Remarkably, this message also seems to apply as Hong Kong residents encounter problems further away. When, for example, the airports in the Thai capital Bangkok were closed by protesters, other governments were quick to offer assistance and help organise alternative means of departure. The Hong Kong government, as ever worried that its actions might impinge on Sino-Thai relations, stood aside until the clamour for action forced it into motion.

    At this point, it needs to be said that complications arise because Hong Kong is not a sovereign state but, as a self-governing entity, has responsibilities that are the same as those of a sovereign power. Thus, Hong Kong cannot establish diplomatic relations nor can it engage in certain types of diplomatic activity while, on the other hand, it actively participates in international bodies just like a sovereign nation. This admittedly strange situation is seen as an excuse for partial paralysis by the Tsang administration, which prefers masterly inaction to anything that gives rise to problems.

    Meanwhile, any hope that Hong Kong's interests might be represented by the hand-picked local delegates to the National People's Congress must be regarded as a joke. The most recent act of Hong Kong deputies was to try and help Hong Kong tycoons evade mainland labour regulations giving workers compensation rights.

    It may be argued that this at least serves the interests of a tiny minority of Hong Kong residents, but it can hardly be described as a noble cause."


  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    位置位置位置
    Posts
    50,054

    Wow .. unusually strong for the SCMP.


  3. #3

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sham Tseng Downtown
    Posts
    492
    Quote Originally Posted by shri:
    Wow .. unusually strong for the SCMP.
    Yea, I was also very surprised when I read the article this morning. Maybe it's the writer's last day... ; )

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,005

    I'm a Canadian citizen and when I and my travelling buddy (both 21 at the time) ended up in jail in Mexico after being robbed of our watches by 6 young thugs I don't recall my government doing anything to help me even though the police had all 8 us in custody. They let the "students" go with our watches because WE BEAT THEM UP!!!

    The fines for the other 7 in our jail cell who were there for robbery, theft assault didn't equal what the 2 of us had to pay. Their trials were conducted by the Chief of Police and ours by the Mayor. When we asked for a receipt for the money we were given the money back and told we had to stay 10 days, no food unless we paid someone to get it for us. We decided to forgo the receipts and paid and got out. The Mayor then joined us for breakfast and I again asked for a receipt which he said I could have only to recall as I walked to City Hall with him that the guy was off work right now - come back tomorrow.

    I reported this to the Canadian Embassy in Mexico City and then proceeded to write complaints to the Mexican authorities on my own. The case closed over the next 6 months or more when they discovered no records were kept.

    My point is that your government cannot do a lot when you choose to travel and can certainly not tell another jurisdiction that they must let you in.

    While the editorial makes a point that Macau might be oversensitive in denying people entry who might pose problems, the facts are that people are turned away by western countries all the time if they think the person is going to be a problem or if they have a criminal record etc. In Canada's case, most of its citizens hope our government tighten restrictions on these phoney refugee claims where we get Honduran drug dealers who use the appeal processes to stay and who say they are there escaping from an oppressive regime.

    The deference show by the HKSAR government to the Mainland no doubt reflects the reality that HKSAR is subservient to the government of China. Let's face it - this is one of the most unique arrangements of government in the modern world. HKSAR has a lot of autonomy but is part of the PRC and is just one of many units in this larger entity.

    Canada still has the Queen as our monarch and the Governor General of Canada (appointed by the Queen on the advice of the Canadian government who provide the names) is the titular head of the armed forces. It was only in 1982 that we patriated the right to change our Constitution which involved amending the British North America Act of 1867.

    Last edited by Football16; 13-03-2009 at 11:03 AM.