If you're going to keep ranting like this could you at least educate yourself on the difference between "principal" and "principle"?
If you're going to keep ranting like this could you at least educate yourself on the difference between "principal" and "principle"?
Lee Cheuk-yan is a great guy who has never been part of any administration. In my view he should made chief executive, but of course that would never be allowed by Beijing.
That was good. Build a nuclear plant to provide all of HK's electricity, with enough spare change for an electric trolleybus system, making HK one of the greenest cities in the world. Alternatively found four new world-class universities.
They both sound like much better uses of the money.
While I am far from anti-nuclear (indeed I think it is probably the future of electricity generation) ... do you have ANY IDEA of the disruption to local residents THAT would involve? I can guarantee more than 150 villagers would need to be relocated.
Or does this fall into the "well I think it's a good idea so for my good ideas we can disrupt as many as we like".
the disruption may be true depending where they put it, and I would fear that far more greenies would protest a nuke plant...but it would definitely be a more useful end product (if it was ever actually done...) with a more easily quantifiable benefit
Wasn't one of the reasons behind the french built nuclear plant just across the border at Daya Bay that it would also supply HK?