The New Express Train Link

Reply
Page 10 of 11 FirstFirst ... 2 7 8 9 10 11 LastLast
  1. #91

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    23,205

    If you're going to keep ranting like this could you at least educate yourself on the difference between "principal" and "principle"?


  2. #92

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Siu Sai Wan
    Posts
    1,660

    FIFY (Fixed it for you)

    Quote Originally Posted by HKITperson:
    Donald Tsang and his crew are a bunch of highly paid lawyers sitting in ivory towers masquarading as the "voices of HK conscience"

  3. #93

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    6,076

    Lee Cheuk-yan is a great guy who has never been part of any administration. In my view he should made chief executive, but of course that would never be allowed by Beijing.


  4. #94

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,960
    Quote Originally Posted by bookblogger:
    Lee Cheuk-yan is a great guy who has never been part of any administration. In my view he should made chief executive, but of course that would never be allowed by Beijing.
    Rubbish! Lee Cheuk Yan is just a two faced hypocritice. He certainly protected worker and women rights over the Kam Lai Wai saga didn't he??

  5. #95

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,960
    Quote Originally Posted by PDLM:
    If you're going to keep ranting like this could you at least educate yourself on the difference between "principal" and "principle"?
    ok, so sarcasm is your own retort? Perhaps you could tell me why Anson Chan should be the "voice of conscience"

  6. #96

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Discovery Bay
    Posts
    5,020

    F.A.O. HKITperson:

    Quote Originally Posted by shakermaker:
    Had they achieved the goal of universal suffrage under British Governors, would we still have that today under Chinese rule?
    Yes or no?

  7. #97

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    In a little burrow
    Posts
    943
    Quote Originally Posted by timklip:
    back to the original topic, Tom Holland has some interesting (though far less sexy) options that the govt. could look at for spending $66 billion dollars, in todays SCMP...check out the Monitor on The Back Page
    That was good. Build a nuclear plant to provide all of HK's electricity, with enough spare change for an electric trolleybus system, making HK one of the greenest cities in the world. Alternatively found four new world-class universities.

    They both sound like much better uses of the money.

  8. #98

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Gold Coast Marina
    Posts
    17,934
    Quote Originally Posted by Sigga:
    T Build a nuclear plant to provide all of HK's electricity, .
    While I am far from anti-nuclear (indeed I think it is probably the future of electricity generation) ... do you have ANY IDEA of the disruption to local residents THAT would involve? I can guarantee more than 150 villagers would need to be relocated.

    Or does this fall into the "well I think it's a good idea so for my good ideas we can disrupt as many as we like".

  9. #99

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,419

    the disruption may be true depending where they put it, and I would fear that far more greenies would protest a nuke plant...but it would definitely be a more useful end product (if it was ever actually done...) with a more easily quantifiable benefit


  10. #100

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Yuen Long
    Posts
    1,550

    Wasn't one of the reasons behind the french built nuclear plant just across the border at Daya Bay that it would also supply HK?


Reply
Page 10 of 11 FirstFirst ... 2 7 8 9 10 11 LastLast