Reply
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Like Tree7Likes

Multi Quote v/s Threaded Replies

  1. #11

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    5,380
    Quote Originally Posted by Mat
    @shri - one thing I noticed that drags the thread down is the multi quote thing.

    HC, DH and as few others are big users of it and all it does is allow to cherry pick sentences/paragraphs and move them out of the context of a general post...and of course you can write a good /clear post but have a few "so so" sentence....and guess what...that's what will be used to kick start a petty argument.

    You would think grown up men would see that and stop right there but clearly that's not the case. Maybe to help, would it make sense to just stop that feature?
    Huh?

    Quote Originally Posted by DirtyHairy
    I kind of agree with you...but how would you answer a multi-point post? Would you have a new post for every point?

    In my last post, I numbered the points so anyone who answers might only need answer the number...that might be annoying if it's answered a few pages away...
    What?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mat
    I have never once mutliquoted on this website as far as I can recall and it's working just fine.

    It's pointless in my view.

    Politicians do that all the time and we see the result.

    HC / you have multiquoted me many times, I just answer as a whole and if I go point by point I do it as a whole too. Makes no sense to pick and chose - unless all you want is to pick a fight...which is of course what many people look for at some point.
    Whatever.

    Quote Originally Posted by HowardCoombs
    If I want to pick a fight with you, I can do it with or without multi quote. Your argument and assertion is folly.
    Right.

    Quote Originally Posted by shri
    I thought I'd posted a reply but cannot find it.

    Moving forward, I'm more inclined to use multi-threaded replies.

    You reply to a reply as opposed to reply to the thread with a quote.

    Have to think about it - certainly don't want a deep tree structure to deal with.
    Interesting.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mat
    Yes you sure can - the multiquote encourage it for the reason highlighted above (and proven days in days out by you, DH etc).

    It allows to take one or two badly sentences out of a whole thread and start spending time on that and then it spirals down.

    A favorite of politicians.


    Quote Originally Posted by HowardCoombs
    The only thing that is proven is that I like to argue. The reason is just invented by you.
    And this post, right here, the one I'm writing shows you that if I want to argue, I can still argue. Preventing me from multi-quoting will not change my motivation nor the outcome.
    I'll take that as a compliment


    Quote Originally Posted by kimwy66
    The threads spiral out of control because of people, nothing to do with the use or not of multi-quotes.

    Please do not go to multi-threaded replies, those things are the pox of all poxes on continuity and coherence. Disqus is the classic example of the a terrible tech solution to a people-problem.

    Just stop the testosterone-fueled king-of-the-castle crap from ALL sides. Selective banning as currently happens just enables some here to think they have impunity to be keyboard twats.


    What's the problem here?
    HowardCoombs and hullexile like this.

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    薄扶林
    Posts
    24,522

    What's the problem here - About HC / DH and their continued love fest ...

    Have a GeoExpat related problem - please create a support ticket.

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    9,173
    Quote Originally Posted by shri
    What's the problem here - About HC / DH and their continued love fest ...
    Just ban them both. Having to scroll through pages and pages of "hidden because of yours ignore list" posts is just tedious. Although less tedious than reading the tripe.
    TheBrit likes this.

Reply
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2