Global Warming

Reply
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4
  1. #31

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Pampanga, Philippines
    Posts
    27,001
    Quote Originally Posted by PDLM:
    I could probably find a load more errors if I could be bothered to spend the time, but here's an obvious one. The reason Lomborg didn't make such a statement is that it would simply have been untrue. No-one called Ridley has ever been the editor of The Economist; there have been only 16 of them over the past 266 years, and they are listed here: The Economist - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
    Joining in the pedant brigade, that should be 166 years not 266 years. I thought nearly 20 years per editor was a long time.

  2. #32

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    23,217

    Corrected - thanks. Over 10 years per editor is still pretty good going.


  3. #33

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4,905

    Another arrogant scientist that thinks we can fix the problem... Many of the times that we've tried fixing an environmental problem, we ended up causing another one. That's what happens when you do things that you don't fully understand...

    It's a cop out to avoid having to stop all the damaging things we've been doing...


Reply
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4