Section 28(2) of the Summary Offences Ordinance would beg to differ.Original Post Deleted
Section 28(2) of the Summary Offences Ordinance would beg to differ.Original Post Deleted
I thinkis saying that no sensible person would willingly give himself a criminal record over an incidence that hurt no one, and not trying to say that it isn't a crime to be publicly drunk.Original Post Deleted
Incidentally, the problem with the whole "true apology" argument is that sometimes you just can't get consensus from both parties on what constitutes "true apology". So what I usually do is tell the other side, "this is what I'm willing to apologize for. if not acceptable, sue me."
Next time, just push the red emergency button and get them arrested for drunken and disorderly conduct. They don't deserve further discussions.