Like Tree206Likes

White guys gone nut on MTR, no one stood up against them

Closed Thread
Page 15 of 15 FirstFirst ... 7 12 13 14 15
  1. #141

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,362
    Original Post Deleted
    Section 28(2) of the Summary Offences Ordinance would beg to differ.

  2. #142

    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    319
    Quote Originally Posted by ray98:
    Section 28(2) of the Summary Offences Ordinance would beg to differ.
    I think
    Original Post Deleted
    is saying that no sensible person would willingly give himself a criminal record over an incidence that hurt no one, and not trying to say that it isn't a crime to be publicly drunk.

    Incidentally, the problem with the whole "true apology" argument is that sometimes you just can't get consensus from both parties on what constitutes "true apology". So what I usually do is tell the other side, "this is what I'm willing to apologize for. if not acceptable, sue me."

  3. #143

    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Pokfulam; office in Central
    Posts
    267

    Next time, just push the red emergency button and get them arrested for drunken and disorderly conduct. They don't deserve further discussions.


  4. #144

    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Location Location
    Posts
    1,201
    Quote Originally Posted by WhiteGuyOnMTR:

    - If you felt offended and disrespected, I am sorry. Possibly others felt the same too, fair enough;
    Isn't this what's known as a non-apology?

  5. #145

    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Pokfulam; office in Central
    Posts
    267
    Quote Originally Posted by greenmark:
    Isn't this what's known as a non-apology?
    Shouldn't have to apologize for your racial identity, right?

Closed Thread
Page 15 of 15 FirstFirst ... 7 12 13 14 15