Or inform the authority and let them deal with the disturbance, or take a video and let the internet mob deal with them, which is what some of us have been suggesting. Personally confronting the problem always carries a risk. And you may not even be the most appropriate person to handle the task given the situation.
I was under the impression she started the thread looking for approval from others, but that's just me. Given that no one was physically hurt except maybe a few bruised egos, if it were me I would just accept and move on. Better than Internet doxxing or death threats.
https://raisingwhasians.com/wp-conte...-car-craft.jpgOriginal Post Deleted
Section 28(2) of the Summary Offences Ordinance would beg to differ.Original Post Deleted
I thinkis saying that no sensible person would willingly give himself a criminal record over an incidence that hurt no one, and not trying to say that it isn't a crime to be publicly drunk.Original Post Deleted
Incidentally, the problem with the whole "true apology" argument is that sometimes you just can't get consensus from both parties on what constitutes "true apology". So what I usually do is tell the other side, "this is what I'm willing to apologize for. if not acceptable, sue me."
Next time, just push the red emergency button and get them arrested for drunken and disorderly conduct. They don't deserve further discussions.
This thread has been excellent at drawing those with chips on their shoulder out of the closet