I think you are right, only the paranoid survive, so go for the passport.
I think you are right, only the paranoid survive, so go for the passport.
In ROPT all parties bear their own costs; there are no cost orders. If I win at the ROPT and am taken to the CFI by the Government, it is difficult to see how I can have a cost-order against me, as I am not the one taking the matter into the High Court.
The ROPT confirmed 3 years ago there are no cost orders - https://geoexpat.com/forum/54/thread310005-6.html
Last edited by dossier; 29-05-2018 at 02:21 PM.
Definition of "settled" is on http://www.gqb.gov.cn/news/2016/0505/39044.shtml
Hudson Loh also didn't have to pay a penny, as it was all funded by legal aid. So Hudson's total costs were zero, assuming as a c. 10 year old, he didn't have much in the way of net assets.
I'm not sure if Tim Loh paid for any external legal work, but assuming not, his costs were also zero.
Thanks. The ROPT is a private process, so it will not becoming public unless it progresses into the CFI or beyond.
Regarding costs, past precedent showed there was no cost award, where the Appellant won in the ROPT, but the Immd took it further to the CFI.
HCAL 136 of 2013 - James McAllister - 50. The Commissioner does not ask for costs. I therefore further order that there be no order as to costs of this application.
HCAL 11 of 2013 - Man Wai Sing - 71. I further make an order nisi that there be no order as to costs. The order shall become absolute 14 days from today, unless any of the parties applies to vary it by summons.