Like Tree18Likes

Learning Chinese Dialects

Closed Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
  1. #11

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    6,180
    Quote Originally Posted by chingleutsch:
    the local universities in the area was able to put in me contact with some advanced English language students from that area.
    That is very inefficient if they have no formal teach-xyz-as-foreign-language training. As a minimum requirement you need *FL skills and setup your own learn method, with them as puppets.

    This said, it might be the only way due to lack of learning material.

  2. #12

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    645
    香港本土語言保育協會 has some dictionaries and previously ran Hakka classes.
    imparanoic likes this.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,772
    Quote Originally Posted by GentleGeorge:
    And that's pseudo-scientific mumbo jumbo.

    Your very next sentence proves the wisdom of the age-old adage.
    Hi, I have an actual master in Oriental linguistics, a copy of the degree in question can always be provided to you.
    On a similar note more academic articles can always be provided to you.

    But anyway, let's humor you for one second. If, as you say, the Sino-Tibetan languages group would suddenly be "dialects", then for example the Germanic languages like English, German, would also have to be classified likewise. If you'd prefer to call German a "dialect", be my guest.

    Secondly, if Cantonese, Shanghainese are dialects but Mandarin would be a language, could you detail which language in common Cantonese, Shanghainese are a derived dialect of?

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    11,711
    Quote Originally Posted by dengxi:
    香港本土語言保育協會 has some dictionaries and previously ran Hakka classes.
    the hakka pronouncation dictonary is awesome, brush up my hakka skills (actually my mother tongue in uk) which has been neglected for decades in favour of cantonese.
    dengxi and WeeRandomer like this.

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Tuen Mun
    Posts
    2,074
    Quote Originally Posted by flameproof:
    That is very inefficient if they have no formal teach-xyz-as-foreign-language training. As a minimum requirement you need *FL skills and setup your own learn method, with them as puppets.
    Depends if you are trying to learn a language for academic purposes or in order to communicate with monolingual native speakers.

    Its also possible to find people who are "born" teachers who are a whole lot better at one-on-one instruction than those who have passed exams on how to teach, but I admit that is up to the luck of the draw.

  7. #17

    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    3,240
    Quote Originally Posted by Gatts:
    Secondly, if Cantonese, Shanghainese are dialects but Mandarin would be a language, could you detail which language in common Cantonese, Shanghainese are a derived dialect of?
    Well Canto is closer to the original precursor ('latin'?) but since Guoyu has the army, it takes the prize. But they are much more similar than English and German, as they share a written system and are basically mutually intelligible if you listen really, really hard.

  8. #18

  9. #19

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,772
    Quote Originally Posted by GentleGeorge:
    Well Canto is closer to the original precursor ('latin'?) but since Guoyu has the army, it takes the prize. But they are much more similar than English and German, as they share a written system and are basically mutually intelligible if you listen really, really hard.
    Well no, they are many languages which are way closer to each other then, for example, Cantonese and Mandarin. Take Dutch and German as just one example of many.

    Secondly, you might not realize this but there is big difference in writing system between Cantonese and Mandarin. If Cantonese was a mere dialect, a difference in pronunciation would not necessitate different Cantonese-only characters. As just a small example: 喺, 冇,乜嘢, etc. A mere dialect would also keep the same word order, but there are many syntax differences which one sees in Cantonese and not in Mandarin, as for example "I give him a book": 我畀本書佢 in Canto vs. 我給他一本書 in Mandarin.

    All the above clearly indicate why calling Cantonese (or any of the other Sino-Tibetan languages), as a "dialect" is madness and/or pure propaganda.
    WeeRandomer and Paxbritannia like this.

  10. #20

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Pampanga, Philippines
    Posts
    29,763
    Quote Originally Posted by Gatts:
    Well no, they are many languages which are way closer to each other then, for example, Cantonese and Mandarin. Take Dutch and German as just one example of many.

    Secondly, you might not realize this but there is big difference in writing system between Cantonese and Mandarin. If Cantonese was a mere dialect, a difference in pronunciation would not necessitate different Cantonese-only characters. As just a small example: 喺, 冇,乜嘢, etc. A mere dialect would also keep the same word order, but there are many syntax differences which one sees in Cantonese and not in Mandarin, as for example "I give him a book": 我畀本書佢 in Canto vs. 我給他一本書 in Mandarin.

    All the above clearly indicate why calling Cantonese (or any of the other Sino-Tibetan languages), as a "dialect" is madness and/or pure propaganda.
    Totally agree with everything you say, except jokingly you said German as a dialect of English. As an Anglo-Saxon I would suggest English as a dialect of German
    Gatts and foreverhobbes like this.