Guy got what he deserved give his lack of common sense IMO.
I'm far more interested in the website and how laser-eye focused it is on the shallowest and most superficial aspects of any healthy relationship, which for me is infinitely more fascinating than any of its users. Guys wanting trophy wife is not new, money also doesn't discriminate based on race.
I'm half a mind to register on the site just to see how cringeworthy it is, but it's awfully expensive and I got more, uh huh, bang for the buck talking to an Ashley Madison AI bot.
Funnily enough, the founder of the dating agency was not interested in dating his current wife at the first place. He had a marriage with a Ukrainian wife. Apparently, it didn't work out. He knew Dasha (his current wife) when he was 30. She was only 16 at that point. Plus, she had a boyfriend. Due to his lack of interest in a 16-year-old model, it confused the hell out of the blonde. She's used to being worshipped by multiple men. She couldn't take no for an answer and she asked him out.
Depends on how you define what is shallow and superficial. There are a lot of things that can generate female sexual attraction. Height, looks, wealth, muscles, humour, social status, to name a few. How do we judge which one is shallow and which isn't? And I would not hesitate to say the majority of relationships in the world isn't the soul-mate type. Does it make them less healthy?
An answer straight out of Socrates' mouth, answer questions with even more questions, except they are supposed to generate critical thinking, and not acting a last refuge of the super passive aggressive. I believe it's also known among some circle as "sealioning"
Sea lion | Sea-Lioning | Know Your Meme