Like Tree56Likes

Harry got hitched...

Closed Thread
Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6
  1. #51

    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    6,531

    No one answered my language question!

    I think the title of this thread should be changed to:
    Harry is going to get hitched.


  2. #52

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Pampanga, Philippines
    Posts
    29,768
    Quote Originally Posted by Elegiaque:
    No one answered my language question!

    I think the title of this thread should be changed to:
    Harry is going to get hitched.
    You are correct, "getting hitched" is what they should have said
    Elegiaque likes this.

  3. #53

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    HK
    Posts
    14,624
    Quote Originally Posted by Elegiaque:
    No one answered my language question!

    I think the title of this thread should be changed to:
    Harry is going to get hitched.
    There it should have been:

    Prince Henry Charles Albert David Mountbatten-Windsor is going to get married to Rachel Meghan Markle

    Happy?
    Elegiaque likes this.

  4. #54

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    2,260
    Quote Originally Posted by Markx:
    Indeed they are. But check how large the official residence (the Hotel Matignon) of the French head of state is, compared to all these off limits buildings in the UK. Hell, you have one head of state in France, but a whole extended family in the UK, with each member living in a palace.

    https://www.google.com.hk/maps/place...2.320638?hl=en

    British Royal Residences | Unofficial Royalty



    Open all these castles to tourists, and you will see how many more will come.
    You just want what you can't have! lol! i don't think the official homes are that interesting - they are just like regular countryside mansions.

    There are loads of nice castles in England (Warwick, Dover etc.) open to the public, more interesting and probably more like what tourists expect e.g. towers, forts, moats etc. They can envisage the knights in shining armour, rather than Prince Charles going to the loo.

  5. #55

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    564

    OK I know I am a little late on this thread and my views might seem controversial but I have to get this off my chest.

    Centuries of selective breeding only to go off and mate with someone of inferior genetic make-up? What a terrible decision.

    Still I guess it is her mistake to make marrying a ginger.


  6. #56

    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    121

    Title of thread is misleading. Should be:

    Up and coming actress marries unemployed ginger on welfare - fans baffled "what's wrong with her"?


Closed Thread
Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6