Your 'just' refers to 94% of the cost.Original Post Deleted
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/18/the-...-security.html
Your 'just' refers to 94% of the cost.Original Post Deleted
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/18/the-...-security.html
No one knows so it is just make a figure up time. For example one estimate I saw included the pro-rata salary of all police and forces as though they would not be paid otherwise.Original Post Deleted
Didn't the extra cost of the wedding have special funding from the national parliament at around £2.8m
With 18m viewers in the UK that would work out at around 16p per domestic viewer. What was the cost per viewer when you factor in international viewers?
Again how much did it cost for the viewers to see the event?
Pretty cheap advertising for the UK.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/ro...tor-2018-05-14
Once again, when there's no transparency, there's a lot of guesswork. Bottom line is a lot of taxpayers money for fluffOriginal Post Deleted
I don't really care, it's not my money nor would I waste time watching it. I guess it's good for those colonial brits trying to remember the times when the UK was an empire and mattered.Original Post Deleted
In a poll 56% said the lifestyles of members of the Royal Family were too extravagant. Only 39% thought they were about right and just 1% that they were too modest.
Similarly, 57% thought the state gave the monarchy too much money - but the older generation more generous with 47% of the over 50s saying it was too much against 66% of the under 30s.