No.
I was asked if I would prefer a certain type of extrajudicial action from the state and used what data I could find. The probability of an innocent person being hit by a drone is miniscule. The probability of an innocent Chinese national of a certain ethnicity in a certain region of China of being locked up without due process is extremely high.
Anyway back to the very simple question, could you please clarify if you believe Uighurs from Xinjiang are Chinese?
Last edited by East_coast; 11-02-2019 at 11:23 PM.
Still don't believe that, though I am going purely from memory. I am sure I remember a hospital being hit and a wedding party. I seriously doubt drones have a 90% hit rate. Anyway, even if it is several thousand it has nothing to do with the situation with these camps.
I think I read somewhere that Obama believed the accuracy rate for killing intended targets was well over 95%. I believe most were in the open hitting people traveling between places. I dislike any extra judicial activity but argument to suggest that Internment camps are OK because Obama used drones is not logical. The use of internment camps is a domestic policy issue. It is abhorrent and it is nothing to do with drone strikes in Yemen or elsewhere.
The deflecting and 'look over there' type replies appear to be very telling and match what I have read on recent comments on other sites also after a very long silence on discussing these camps.
Judging based on Trump, I think the former.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.6b2faf2ec496