Actually just to correct your misunderstanding the UNCLOS ruling does NOT prohibit Chinese fishing. It allows for traditional fishing rights even at Scarborough Shoal.Original Post Deleted
Actually just to correct your misunderstanding the UNCLOS ruling does NOT prohibit Chinese fishing. It allows for traditional fishing rights even at Scarborough Shoal.Original Post Deleted
Create a law requiring CCTV monitoring to fish. No CCTV then fishing would be illegal and the coast guard can board the boats as they do now for other illegal fishing activities.
MARLEN
They have beefed up the coast guard in the last couple of years and their are some warships being built in Korea. To think they can take on the Chinese Navy is wishful thinking. Of course Iceland did it with the UK in the Cod Wars. China is different to the UK though. Might be able to take on the Vietnamese who actually occupy more Filipino claimed territory than China. But not Malaysia who occupy Sabah province.
What is more important? Managing the fisheries for the nation or placating China?Original Post Deleted
You know that is rubbish don't you. Aquino gave away Scarborough Shoal, the artificial islands and Benham Rise. He got nothing in return.Original Post Deleted
Duterte has lost no territory, has gained Benham Rise and shared fishing at Scarborough Shoal.
But then you are facts are not related are they. Pointless debating with someone who has lost their grip on reality.
For those who live in the real world, interestingly China has now deleted their version of events. No idea what that means