Fastest slippage I’ve seen from non-Bayesian approaches to information, to category errors, to plain (and inaccurate) whataboutism.
At this rate I’m not sure we can rule out the killings were done by a shark, since they also kill people.
Fastest slippage I’ve seen from non-Bayesian approaches to information, to category errors, to plain (and inaccurate) whataboutism.
At this rate I’m not sure we can rule out the killings were done by a shark, since they also kill people.
The reason people replied to you in the first place is because you said this - "It's not clear to me how you can infer anything from the possession of an Al-Qaeda training manual." You ignored the ricin altogether.
If it's not clear to you how someone might put 'slaying of three children" and "al Qaeda training manual" together, and come up with Muslim inspired terrorist then were you born yesterday, or do you, maybe, have your own agenda?
You have no problem seeing Jewish related atrocities it seems.
Well since it seems important to you, I reviewed the list of known incidents involving ricin. It seems to me that muslims feature in rather few of them. The two most common attributes for propagators are "being American" and "being a Russian/Soviet/East Euopean agent".
So I don't see how I can infer religion from the use of ricin.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...nvolving_ricin
And this is what makes the US great. We kill over drugs, gang turf, and mass shootings for absolutely no reason other than hating the world or being batshiti nsane. Equal opportunity hatred.
For arson this seems lenient if anything. Levi Fishlock, a good Anglo Saxon name.
https://news.sky.com/story/levi-fish...dTL_kYTXXWJ2Uw