Trump's Ukraine peace plan - looks like...

[SirNotAppearing]

Biggest difference being Churchill attended the Royal Military College and served in India, Africa, and WW1. Zelensky has zero military training or experience.

The implication being Ukraine should have been easily overrun?

[AsianXpat0]

Baaa. The tangerine is well in with Putin, and sadly (but not surprisingly) your 'average' Republican is quite happy to be supporting Russia over the Ukraine.

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-re...ffer-by-party/

Reminds me of the before/after 30 no heart/brain quote.

[bobly]

It's not me spouting idiocy here.

Chinese are all about certifications and trophies on the wall.

[aquaman]

at least its a jump suit

Churchill visiting the White House during ww2 - not wearing a suit.

Attachment 91141

[hongkongmusic]

It's not me spouting idiocy here.

Point out which part was inaccurate. Churchill was a career military man with battle experience on 3 continents. Zelensky wearing what he is wearing is a symbolic gesture and knows absolutely nothing about war tactics and strategies. No opinions. Just pure facts.

[hongkongmusic]

The implication being Ukraine should have been easily overrun?

The implication being some of you are so sensitive. Churchill had 100% credibility as a military leader. Zelensky certainly hasn't proven himself. Perhaps he will in the future.

[Gatts]

The implication being some of you are so sensitive. Churchill had 100% credibility as a military leader. Zelensky certainly hasn't proven himself. Perhaps he will in the future.

The guy has literally valiantly resisted a huge army invading his much smaller nation for 3 years and counting, of which the opponent claimed it would be over in 3 days. Come again?

[hullexile]

Point out which part was inaccurate. Churchill was a career military man with battle experience on 3 continents. Zelensky wearing what he is wearing is a symbolic gesture and knows absolutely nothing about war tactics and strategies. No opinions. Just pure facts.

You don't think that three years leading his country in a war, talking strategy with his military leaders, he might just have a lot more knowledge than most?

I assume you are not being serious but doing your usual trolling.

[SirNotAppearing]

The implication being some of you are so sensitive. Churchill had 100% credibility as a military leader. Zelensky certainly hasn't proven himself. Perhaps he will in the future.

Even Churchill needed the Yanks in the end.

[chobochobo]

Not having the Yanks support the Soviets was nice too.