Is that why they elected him because of his intelligence and financial experience? I thought most financial experts were suggesting that responding in kind to Trump's tariffs is not a great idea? I thought a very wise and prudent man might offer something else than tit-for-tat?
My sense is that (like the election of Trump) it was an emotional choice and after it settles down in a few months, the people who were struggling with the cost of living pre-tariffs, and who changed their minds, might have buyer's remorse.
If you read my original post you may have seen the reference to how unhappy people were with the Liberal party after so many years in office. It stands to reason that if the party in charge for over a decade hasn't been able to get things right , the population would usually turn to another party to give them a chance. That's how democracy tends to work. This is a bit like Boris Johnson leading the Tories to victory. Johnson used Brexit to propel an unpopular party to victory. Carney used Trump.
So this is an emotional decision in my view, electing a guy they don't even know because he spoke out against a leader of another country.
"A guy they don't even know"
Trump level of reality. I think they knew of him.
To me given the choice I think it was a totally rational decision. Following the discussions on FB over the last few weeks all the emotion (mostly hatred and abuse) seemed to be coming from the Conservative side.
I didn't say any deals have been. I think they will be done though. I think if you listen to what leaders are saying the EU is not going to rock the boat. The UK is salivating at the prospect of a renewed special relationship. Most experienced politicians are smart enough to know how to deal with Trump, to get what they want, to get through the next four years, and to let him have enough to be able to claim victory.
It's just an opinion though.