Like Tree139Likes

Bin Laden Found Dead?

Closed Thread
Page 29 of 43 FirstFirst ... 21 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 37 ... LastLast
  1. #281

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Back in California (finally!).
    Posts
    2,079
    Quote Originally Posted by HKITperson:
    I agree.... if let's say China goes in and snatches some dissident... what would be the reaction in the US I wonder.
    That's a great encapsulation of your moral universe, HKIT. Osama Bin Ladin = Ai Wei Wei.
    Dreadnought and Gatts like this.

  2. #282

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,043
    Quote Originally Posted by Football16 View Post
    HKIT... Pakistan "scrambled" their air force meaning I assume that they put planes in the sky after reports of this event and all the fireworks.


    If these US intruders were in Pakistan air space they could be shot down! Of course they had to get out fast meaning the time on the ground was likely very carefully planned like a bank robbery where they escape before the police arrive.


    Quote Originally Posted by HKITperson:
    This is the part where I fail to understand. Pakistan are allies and they were not in hostile territory. It isn't as though they were in a enemy war zone. Do you seriously think that the Pakistan air force would shoot down a US plane? Would the situation had simply been better if they just stayed put and waited for local authorities? Would they have been arrested?... I don't know the answers but just throwing about some open questions.
    You are not understanding I assume what happens when planes are flying and people back at the base give approval to engage the enemy if they refuse to comply with their orders to follow them to some air base. In this case language too could be an issue.

    What if the Pakistan air force had any skills and simply approached these helicopters as they were in their air space and shot them down - no questions asked?

    This would have be a huge disaster and the Americans would have been pissed but what could they do? Start bombing their capital in retaliation? I doubt it.

    It seems the Americans here knew they had some limited time to get in if they avoided radar, land, shoot the place up and get out in as few minutes as they could and run for the border. American air superiority being what it is - they no doubt knew exactly how long it would take their air force to get planes in the air. I suspect timing was crucial and the assault team and air crews and mission commander knew exactly what they were doing and how much time they had.

    There are all kinds of situations where one country violates another's space like the US invading Canadian waters in the Arctic to try and prove these are international waters and not part of Canada's coast and lands as most of the islands are occupied by few people up there if at all. The US is supposed to register with Canada but they thumb their noses at us and we protest each year. I doubt Canada is big enough to start bombing Washington to get even. Just like Pak'n is not likely to retaliate other than if a trigger happy air crew took one of them out.

  3. #283

  4. #284

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    7,441
    Quote Originally Posted by Freetrader:
    Mmm, but I thought Pakistan denied OBL was even in the country? It might help, virago, if you read some of the posts before making these comments.

    The Pakistan/US relationship is interesting, but it has always been interesting. There has always been a lot of resentment in Pakistan toward the Americans for supposedly "abandoning" them after the Cold War and for cozying up to India. There are already a ton of terrorist gorups in Pakistan - most of them focused on Kashmir or allied with the Taliban. Pakinstan has been and remains a pretty messed-up country in many ways. What is completely clear, however, is that OBL and AQ are less popular in Pakistan than ever.
    I'm not interested in reading 30 pages to find these supposedly true facts. However i did read some of these supposedly hard fact comments that Governments lie (USA was mentioned as well as most other nations) but this doesn't state that Pakistan sponsored and harbored OBL. These are just allegations and suggestions and nothing else.

    OBL's choice of location has been considered by analysts as brilliant, who would have expected him to be a mile from a major military base. Most of the searching was around locations where the US and Pakistan thought he may be hiding.

  5. #285

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Hong Kong Island
    Posts
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by virago:
    OBL's choice of location has been considered by analysts as brilliant, who would have expected him to be a mile from a major military base. Most of the searching was around locations where the US and Pakistan thought he may be hiding.
    Interesting article:

    BBC News - Bin Laden compound location suggested by 2008 study

  6. #286

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    167
    Original Post Deleted
    So are the 'unwashed masses' generally not competent to make informed judgments on whether or not a given act is legal or are they just not competent to assess the legality of this particular killing? Unfortunately, the ignorant rabble are still expected to abide by the law whether they possess the intellectual sophistication to know what it is or not.

  7. #287

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Discovery Bay
    Posts
    5,018
    Quote Originally Posted by HKITperson:
    Was it Rumsfield who admitted telling that they will bomb Pakistan back to the dark ages if they did not join the "coalition of the willing"?
    Negative - it was then Deputy Secretary of State, Richard Armitage.

    Quote Originally Posted by HKITperson:
    This is the part where I fail to understand. Pakistan are allies and they were not in hostile territory. It isn't as though they were in a enemy war zone. Do you seriously think that the Pakistan air force would shoot down a US plane? Would the situation had simply been better if they just stayed put and waited for local authorities? Would they have been arrested?... I don't know the answers but just throwing about some open questions.
    You are assuming that Pakistani radar would identify the intruders as USN choppers. Radar picks up intruders, but they do not reveal the identity of the intruders, hence the need to scramble fighter jets. This being close so to Islamabad, may well have had the air force thinking that the IAF had launched an invasion of sorts. How are they to know if the intruders are allies or not, if they haven't been informed of the incursion?
    Last edited by Dreadnought; 05-05-2011 at 11:34 PM.

  8. #288

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Tuen Mun
    Posts
    6,191

    "I mourn the loss of thousands of precious lives, but I will not rejoice in the death of one, not even an enemy. Returning hate for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that." – Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

    MovingIn07 likes this.

  9. #289

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Discovery Bay
    Posts
    5,018
    Quote Originally Posted by bryant.english:
    "I mourn the loss of thousands of precious lives, but I will not rejoice in the death of one, not even an enemy. Returning hate for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that." – Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
    That's really sweet, but he wasn't just hated, or hadn't just killed. This was no retirement home. He was wanted because he was still the head of Al Qaeda and was still planning to kill, thus still a threat.

  10. #290

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,960
    Quote Originally Posted by Freetrader:
    That's a great encapsulation of your moral universe, HKIT. Osama Bin Ladin = Ai Wei Wei.
    What a cloth eared idiot you really are. I didn't draw the distinction.... merely stating how you perceive the situation if China or Russia or Iran decides to take out their enemies in the US.

    1) "it is not illegal in any way. The president has the authority to order military action, etc., etc. It was a military action"

    2) if something is clearly extrajudicial (what the spooks would call "covert"), it is ever justified? In some cases, such as this one the answer should be 'yes'

    3) "Murder" is a legally-defined term. He was "killed"

Closed Thread
Page 29 of 43 FirstFirst ... 21 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 37 ... LastLast