meaning that the ideology is weaker than as they value convenience over principal, which is rather hypocritical, very similar to what cummings in UK advises to the public but does the exact opposite.Original Post Deleted
yet they don't boycott macdonalds, owned by citic group which mainland gov owns partially, where is the school of thought there.Original Post Deleted
Personally i am neutral, neither against or for government.
No, neither, i don't know enough about tibet or xinjiang, have you even been there?Original Post Deleted
First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
Martin Niemöller (1892–1984)
To quote Desmond Tutu: “If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its foot on the tail of a mouse and you say that you are neutral, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality.â€
just saying, horrible things happen in the world all the time, afganistan suicide bomb almost 200 during this month, just this morning, minnepolis police kill an unarmed black man by kneeing on his neckOriginal Post Deleted
protest can be peaceful and achieve their ultimate goals, just look at Ghandi's movement, same with Nelson mandela and martin luther king never instigated or cause any violence
BBC - Ethics - War: Non-violence