This one stands out for being manifestly excessive even by HK lawfare standards.
A look at UK - https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk...-revised-2017/
Maximum one month sentence with many aggravating factors to consider before hitting that.
Even Singapore, with a max of 4 years imprisonment for using criminal force and hardly known to go easy on disruptions to law and order had the following sentence below.
amp.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/law-crime/article/1807394/activist-jailed-obstructing-police-during-occupy-protestIn Emmanuel s/o Munisamy v Public Prosecutor [2007] SGDC 72, a sentence of three months’ imprisonment was meted out to the accused who, while being handcuffed by a police officer for using abusive language on a public servant, broke free, hit the police officer’s neck and grabbed his head with both hands, causing the police officer to sustain several injuries.
Even comparing to their own previous standards, somebody with a suspended jail sentence, and with another conviction for charging police lines only merited three weeks when a few police officers involved were allegedly injured.
Then you compare it to actual instances of aggression by the pro-establishment people, and yeah. Draw your own conclusions whether the deciding magistrate lost all sense of proportion.
This one? https://youtu.be/TpihQlRCVeo